4.8 Article

Improved high-voltage and high-temperature electrochemical performances of LiCoO2 cathode by electrode sputter-coating with Li3PO4

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 322, 期 -, 页码 10-16

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.04.092

关键词

LiCoO2; Composite electrode; Surface coating; Sputtering; Li3PO4; High temperature

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21073029, 11234013, 21473022, 51502032]
  2. Science and Technology Bureau of Sichuan Province of China [2015HH0033]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [ZYGX2012Z003, ZYGX2015J027]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Surface coating has long been an important strategy to improve the electrochemical performances of electrode materials for Li-ion batteries. In this work, an amorphous Li3PO4 (LPO) layer, which is a poor electronic conductor but good ionic conductor, is coated directly on LiCoO2 composite electrodes by magnetron sputtering. The battery performances of the electrodes are studied at both room temperature (RT) and 50 degrees C. The LPO sputter-coating allows significant improvement of the electrode's cycling stability at both temperatures. With an optimum coating thickness of similar to 60 nm, the electrode's capacity after 100 cycles at 1 C can reach 146 mAh g(-1), (79.3% retention) and 140 mAh g(-1) (78.2% retention) at RT and 50 degrees C, which are improved by 30% and 200%, respectively, compared to those of the bare LCO electrode. More impressively, the rate capability is also greatly enhanced by LPO-coating, and the observed high temperature rate capability is even superior to the room-temperature one. The remarkable improvement of the LPO-coated electrodes is mainly attributed to the high chemical stability and temperature enhanced electrochemical activity of the LPO coating layer, which synergistically serves as a physiochemical protection layer and an efficient pathway for Li+ transport. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据