4.8 Review

Porous Metal Current Collectors for Alkali Metal Batteries

期刊

ADVANCED SCIENCE
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/advs.202205695

关键词

alkali metal anode; current collector; fabrication method; pore structure; porous metal

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alkali metals are promising anode materials for next-generation high-energy-density batteries, but uneven current and ion distribution may cause undesirable dendrite growth. This article introduces a smart and versatile strategy to incorporate alkali metals into porous metal current collectors, addressing these issues and promoting the practical application of alkali metal anodes.
Alkali metals (i.e., Li, Na, and K) are promising anode materials for next-generation high-energy-density batteries due to their superior theoretical specific capacities and low electrochemical potentials. However, the uneven current and ion distribution on the anode surface probably induces undesirable dendrite growth, which leads to significant safety hazards and severely hinders the commercialization of alkali metal anodes. A smart and versatile strategy that can accommodate alkali metals into porous metal current collectors (PMCCs) has been well established to resolve the issues as well as to promote the practical applications of alkali metal anodes. Moreover, the proposal of PMCCs can meet the requirement of the dendrite-free battery fabrication industry, while the electrode material loading exactly needs the metal current collector component as well. Here, a systematic survey on advanced PMCCs for Li, Na, and K alkali metal anodes is presented, including their development timeline, categories, fabrication methods, and working mechanism. On this basis, some significant methodology advances to control pore structure, surface area, surface wettability, and mechanical properties are systematically summarized. Further, the existing issues and the development prospects of PMCCs to improve anode performance in alkali metal batteries are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据