4.5 Article

Polymyxin Stereochemistry and Its Role in Antibacterial Activity and Outer Membrane Disruption

期刊

ACS INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 8, 期 12, 页码 2396-2404

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.2c00307

关键词

polymyxin B; polymyxin B nonapeptide; mechanism of action; stereochemistry; enantiomers

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) [725523]
  2. European Research Council (ERC) [725523] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With increasing antibiotic resistance, there is renewed interest in polymyxins, a type of lipopeptide antibiotics with potent anti-Gram-negative activity. This study synthesized the full enantiomers of polymyxin B and the polymyxin B nonapeptide (PMBN) to investigate their mechanism of action. The enantiomeric species showed reduced antibacterial activity, lower LPS binding, lower outer membrane permeabilization, and loss of synergetic potential, providing new insights into the stereochemical requirements of polymyxin B and PMBN.
With increasing rates of resistance toward commonly used antibiotics, especially among Gram-negative bacteria, there is renewed interested in polymyxins. Polymyxins are lipopeptide antibiotics with potent anti-Gram-negative activity and are generally believed to target lipid A, the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) anchor found in the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria. To characterize the stereochemical aspects of their mechanism(s) of action, we synthesized the full enantiomers of polymyxin B and the polymyxin B nonapeptide (PMBN). Both compounds were compared with the natural compounds in biological and biophysical assays, revealing strongly reduced antibacterial activity for the enantiomeric species. The enantiomeric compounds also exhibit reduced LPS binding, lower outer membrane (OM) permeabilization, and loss of synergetic potential. These findings provide new insights into the stereochemical requirements underlying the mechanisms of action of polymyxin B and PMBN.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据