4.6 Article

Future stem cell analysis: progress and challenges towards state-of-the art approaches in automated cells analysis

期刊

PEERJ
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PEERJ INC
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14513

关键词

Machine learning; Image processing; Artificial intelligence; Microscopic images

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article provides an overview of general cell analysis methods and specific stem cell analysis approaches, highlighting the limitations of traditional methods and suggesting the potential of using modern technologies such as artificial intelligence and deep learning for automated cell analysis.
Background and Aims: A microscopic image has been used in cell analysis for cell type identification and classification, cell counting and cell size measurement. Most previous research works are tedious, including detailed understanding and time-consuming. The scientists and researchers are seeking modern and automatic cell analysis approaches in line with the current in-demand technology. Objectives: This article provides a brief overview of a general cell and specific stem cell analysis approaches from the history of cell discovery up to the state-of-the-art approaches. Methodology: A content description of the literature study has been surveyed from specific manuscript databases using three review methods: manuscript identification, screening, and inclusion. This review methodology is based on Prism guidelines in searching for originality and novelty in studies concerning cell analysis. Results: By analysing generic cell and specific stem cell analysis approaches, current technology offers tremendous potential in assisting medical experts in performing cell analysis using a method that is less laborious, cost-effective, and reduces error rates. Conclusion: This review uncovers potential research gaps concerning generic cell and specific stem cell analysis. Thus, it could be a reference for developing automated cells analysis approaches using current technology such as artificial intelligence and deep learning.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据