4.8 Review

Evaluation of anode (electro)catalytic materials for the direct borohydride fuel cell: Methods and benchmarksy

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 327, 期 -, 页码 235-257

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.07.041

关键词

Direct borohydride fuel cell (DBFC); Anode; Catalyst; Borohydride oxidation reaction (BOR); Hydrogen; Stability

资金

  1. IDS FunMat [2012-10LF]
  2. French University Institute (IUF)
  3. Fonds de la recherche Fondamentale et collective (grant FRFC) [2.4.542.10.F]
  4. Walloon Region (HYLIFE project) [1410135]
  5. Fonds de Bay

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, different methods are discussed for the evaluation of the potential of a given catalyst, in view of an application as a direct borohydride fuel cell DBFC anode material. Characterizations results in DBFC configuration are notably analyzed at the light of important experimental variables which influence the performances of the DBFC. However, in many practical DBFC-oriented studies, these various experimental variables prevent one to isolate the influence of the anode catalyst on the cell performances. Thus, the electrochemical three-electrode cell is a widely-employed and useful tool to isolate the DBFC anode catalyst and to investigate its electrocatalytic activity towards the borohydride oxidation reaction (BOR) in the absence of other limitations. This article reviews selected results for different types of catalysts in electrochemical cell containing a sodium borohydride alkaline electrolyte. In particular, propositions of common experimental conditions and benchmarks are given for practical evaluation of the electrocatalytic activity towards the BOR in three-electrode cell configuration. The major issue of gaseous hydrogen generation and escape upon DBFC operation is also addressed through a comprehensive review of various results depending on the anode composition. At last, preliminary concerns are raised about the stability of potential anode catalysts upon DBFC operation. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据