4.7 Article

Nanomechanics of Ultrathin Carbon Nanomembranes

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano13020267

关键词

carbon nanomembranes; mechanical properties; AFM

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ultrathin carbon nanomembranes (CNMs) are two-dimensional materials with sub-nm intrinsic pores that mimic biofiltration membranes. They exhibit highly selective, permeable, and energy-efficient water separation. This study investigates their mechanical performance and thermal stability using atomic force microscopy (AFM) and tensile testing, and identifies critical parameters affecting their mechanical response.
Ultrathin carbon nanomembranes (CNMs) are two-dimensional materials (2DM) of a few nm thickness with sub-nm intrinsic pores that mimic the biofiltration membranes found in nature. They enable highly selective, permeable, and energy-efficient water separation and can be produced at large scales on porous substrates with tuned properties. The present work reports the mechanical performance of such CNMs produced by p-nitrobiphenyl phosphonic acid (NBPS) or polyvinylbiphenyl (PVBP) and their composite membranes of microporous supporting substrates, which constitute indispensable information for ensuring their mechanical stability during operation. Measuring the nanomechanical properties of the ultrathin material was achieved by atomic force microscopy (AFM) on membranes both supported on flat substrates and suspended on patterned substrates (composite membrane). The AFM analysis showed that the CNMs presented Young's modulus in the range of 2.5-8 GPa. The composite membranes' responses were investigated by tensile testing in a micro-tensile stage as a function of substrate thickness and substrate pore density and diameter, which were found to affect the mechanical properties. Thermogravimetric analysis was used to investigate the thermal stability of composite membranes at high temperatures. The results revealed the structural integrity of CNMs, while critical parameters governing their mechanical response were identified and discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据