4.7 Article

Waste Citrus reticulata Assisted Preparation of Cobalt Oxide Nanoparticles for Supercapacitors

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 12, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano12234119

关键词

Co3O4 nanoparticles; characterization; supercapacitors; charge storage; Citrus reticulata

资金

  1. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) [70NANB20D146]
  2. U.S. Economic Development Administration [05-79-06038]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates a green strategy for the preparation of cobalt oxide nanoparticles using orange peel extract, and enhancing their electrochemical properties through sulfurization and phosphorization. The phosphide-based nanoparticles exhibit over 85% capacitance retention after 5000 cycles.
The green, sustainable, and inexpensive creation of novel materials, primarily nanoparticles, with effective energy-storing properties, is key to addressing both the rising demand for energy storage and the mounting environmental concerns throughout the world. Here, an orange peel extract is used to make cobalt oxide nanoparticles from cobalt nitrate hexahydrate. The orange peel extract has Citrus reticulata, which is a key biological component that acts as a ligand and a reducing agent during the formation of nanoparticles. Additionally, the same nanoparticles were also obtained from various precursors for phase and electrochemical behavior comparisons. The prepared Co-nanoparticles were also sulfurized and phosphorized to enhance the electrochemical properties. The synthesized samples were characterized using scanning electron microscopic and X-ray diffraction techniques. The cobalt oxide nanoparticle showed a specific capacitance of 90 F/g at 1 A/g, whereas the cobalt sulfide and phosphide samples delivered an improved specific capacitance of 98 F/g and 185 F/g at 1 A/g. The phosphide-based nanoparticles offer more than 85% capacitance retention after 5000 cycles. This study offers a green strategy to prepare nanostructured materials for energy applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据