4.7 Article

Phase-Field Simulation on the Effect of Second-Phase Particles on Abnormal Growth of Goss Grains in Fe-3%Si Steels

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 12, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano12234148

关键词

phase-field simulation; abnormal grain growth; Fe-3%Si steel; second-phase particle; Goss grain

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China [N2002017, N2007011]
  2. Project of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities (111 Project) [B20029]
  3. 2021 Annual Scientific Research Funding Project of Liaoning Provincial Department of Education [LJKZ1335]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A revised phase-field model was used to study the abnormal growth of Goss grains during the annealing process in Fe-3%Si steels. The results showed that the abnormal growth is caused by the different dissolvability of the particles at Goss grain boundaries. Moreover, the size advantage of Goss grain can further promote the abnormal growth.
A phase-field model was revised to study the abnormal growth of Goss grains during the annealing process in Fe-3%Si steels, in which the interaction between the second-phase particles and Goss grain boundaries (GBs) was considered. The results indicate that the abnormal growth of Goss grains occurs due to the different dissolvability of the particles at Goss GBs compared with the other GBs. Moreover, the degree of abnormal growth increases first and then decreases with an increasing particle content. Meanwhile, the size advantage of Goss grain can further promote the degree of abnormal growth. Two types of island grains were found according to the simulated results, which is consistent with the experimental observations. A proper GB dissolvability of particles is the key factor for the formation of isolated island grains, and a higher local particle density at GBs is the main reason for the appearance of serial island grains. These findings can provide guidance for the desired texture control in silicon steels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据