4.7 Article

Enhanced Emulsifying Ability of Deoxycholate through Dynamic Interaction with Layered Double Hydroxide

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano13030567

关键词

emulsion formulation; emulsifying ability; emulsifier; deoxycholic acid; layered double hydroxide

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The emulsifying ability of deoxycholic acid (DCA) was improved by dynamic interaction with nanometric layered particles, layered double hydroxide (LDH). The DCA-LDH hybrid successfully prevented the molecular aggregation of DCA under unfavorable conditions for the oil-in-water emulsion.
The emulsifying ability of the naturally occurring surfactant deoxycholic acid (DCA) was improved by dynamic interaction with nanometric layered particles, layered double hydroxide (LDH). As DCA molecules are rigid due to the facial configuration of hydrophobic-hydrophilic groups, they tend to form molecular aggregation in an acidic condition or imbalanced water-lipid ratios. In this study, the homogeneous hybrids of DCA and LDH were obtained by the in situ growth of LDH at a DCA molecule. The DCA-LDH hybrid successfully prevented the molecular aggregation of DCA at an acidic pH and imbalanced water-to-oil ratio. The dynamic light scattering showed that the hydrodynamic radius of micelle in the emulsion made with DCA-LDH maintained its small size (<500 nm), while upon pH change and dilution with water, that made with DCA only uncontrollably increased up to similar to 3000 nm. The polydispersity index value of the DCA-LDH emulsion remained constant (<0.3) after the pH change and dilution with water, indicating the high stability of the formulation. Furthermore, time-dependent turbidity monitoring revealed that the DCA-only formulation suffered from serious coalescence and creaming compared with the DCA-LDH formulation. It is suggested that the dynamic interaction between LDH layers and DCA prevented molecular aggregation under unfavorable conditions for the oil-in-water emulsion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据