4.8 Article

Application of graphene-based nanomaterials as novel cathode catalysts for improving power generation in single chamber microbial fuel cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 327, 期 -, 页码 548-556

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.07.099

关键词

Microbial fuel cell; Cathodic catalyst; Graphene; Nickel nanoparticle; Nanocomposite

资金

  1. Yeungnam University Research Grant
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [22A20152713239] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The low catalytic activity, limited resources, complexity and costs, and non-environmentally friendly nature are key factors limiting the application of non-precious metals and their composites at the cathode in microbial fuel cells (MFCs). This study evaluated the feasibility of graphene-based nano materials (RGO(HI-AcOH) vs. RGO/Ni nanoparticle composite) as novel cathode catalysts in single chamber air-cathode MFCs. A series of MFCs with different catalyst loadings were produced. The electrochemical behavior of the MFCs were evaluated by cyclic voltammetry (CV) and impedance spectroscopy (EIS). As a result, the MFCs with the RGO(HI-AcOH) cathodes showed greater maximum power densities (>37%) than those with the RGO/Ni nanoparticle cathodes. In the MFCs, the highest maximum power density of 1683 +/- 23 mW/m(2) (CE = 72 +/- 3%), which covers 77% of that estimated for Pt/C (2201 +/- 45 mW/m(2), CE = 81 +/- 4%), was obtained from the double loading RGO(HI-AcOH) cathodes. Among the MFCs with the RGO/Ni nanoparticle composite cathodes, those loaded with a double catalyst (1015 +/- 28 mW/m(2), CE = 70 +/- 2%) showed better power performance than the others. Both CV and EIS showed good agreement with the MFC results. This study suggests that the RGO(HI-AcOH) cathode, particularly with a double catalyst loading, is promising for sustainable low-cost green materials, stable power generation and the long-term operation of MFCs. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据