4.5 Article

Spall Fracture of Solid and Molten Copper: Molecular Dynamics, Mechanical Model and Strain Rate Dependence

期刊

METALS
卷 12, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/met12111878

关键词

dynamic tension; spall strength; strain rate dependence; pores and inclusions; solid and molten copper; molecular dynamics; fracture model; Bayesian identification of parameters

资金

  1. Russian Science Foundation [20-79-10229]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a mechanical model of spall fracture of copper is developed and verified, which covers both solid and molten states. The optimal parameters of the model are identified using a machine-learning-type Bayesian algorithm. The influence of initial size distribution of pores or non-wettable inclusions on the strain rate dependence of spall strength in copper is analyzed. This investigation contributes to the development of atomistically-based machine learning approaches in understanding the strength properties of metals and deepening the understanding of the spall fracture process.
In this study, we formulate a mechanical model of spall fracture of copper, which describes both solid and molten states. The model is verified, and its parameters are found based on the data of molecular dynamics simulations of this process under ultrahigh strain rate of tension, leading to the formation of multiple pores within the considered volume element. A machine-learning-type Bayesian algorithm is used to identify the optimal parameters of the model. We also analyze the influence of the initial size distribution of pores or non-wettable inclusions in copper on the strain rate dependence of its spall strength and show that these initial heterogeneities explain the existing experimental data for moderate strain rates. This investigation promotes the development of atomistically-based machine learning approaches to description of the strength properties of metals and deepens the understanding of the spall fracture process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据