4.8 Article

Numerical evaluation of crack growth in polymer electrolyte fuel cell membranes based on plastically dissipated energy

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 316, 期 -, 页码 114-123

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.03.031

关键词

Polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM); Durability; Fatigue; Cyclic crack growth; Plastically dissipated energy; Numerical simulation

资金

  1. Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Office of Fuel Cell Technologies, of the U.S. Department of Energy through Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the mechanisms of growth of defects in polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) fuel cells is essential for improving cell longevity. Characterizing the crack growth in PEM fuel cell membrane under relative humidity (RH) cycling is an important step towards establishing strategies essential for developing more durable membrane electrode assemblies (MEA). In this study, a crack propagation criterion based on plastically dissipated energy is investigated numerically. The accumulation of plastically dissipated energy under cyclical RH loading ahead of the crack tip is calculated and compared to a critical value, presumed to be a material parameter. Once the accumulation reaches the critical value, the crack propagates via a node release algorithm. From the literature, it is well established experimentally that membranes reinforced with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) reinforced perfluorosulfonic acid (PFSA) have better durability than unreinforced membranes, and through-thickness cracks are generally found under the flow channel regions but not land regions in unreinforced PFSA membranes. We show that the proposed plastically dissipated energy criterion captures these experimental observations and provides a framework for investigating failure mechanisms in ionomer membranes subjected to similar environmental loads. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据