4.6 Article

Elucidating the role of multivalency, shape, size and functional group density on antibacterial activity of diversified supramolecular nanostructures enabled by templated assembly

期刊

MATERIALS HORIZONS
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 171-178

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2mh01117d

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports a rational design to fabricate antibacterial supramolecular nanoparticles with variable shape, size, and cationic group density. The systematic variation of structural parameters allowed the researchers to understand the role of each parameter in the overall antibacterial properties.
With the increased prevalence of antibiotic-resistant infections, there is an urgent need to develop novel antibacterial materials. In addition, gaining a complete understanding of the structural features that impart activity toward target microorganisms is essential to enable materials optimisation. Here we have reported a rational design to fabricate antibacterial supramolecular nanoparticles with variable shape, size and cationic group density, by exploiting noncovalent interactions between a shape determining template amphiphile and a cationic amphiphile to introduce charge on the nanoparticle surface. We have shown that the monomeric cationic amphiphile alone showed poor antibacterial activity, whereas nanostructures formed by co-assembling the complementary units showed significantly enhanced antibacterial efficiency. Further, the systematic variation of several structural parameters such as shape, spacing between the cationic groups and size of these nanostructures allowed us to elicit the role of each parameter on the overall antibacterial properties. Finally, we investigated the origin of the differing antibacterial activity of these nanoparticles having different shape and size but with the same molecular composition, by comparing the thermodynamic parameters of their binding interactions with a bacterial membrane mimic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据