4.6 Article

Linear optical afterglow and nonlinear optical harmonic generation from chiral tin(iv) halides: the role of lattice distortions

期刊

MATERIALS HORIZONS
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 1005-1011

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2mh01429g

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The chemical variability of hybrid organic-inorganic metal halides (HOMHs) gives them fascinating optoelectronic properties. The optical properties of tin(iv) halides have been tuned by structural distortion facilitated by chiral amines. The lattice deformations of HOMHs enable different functionalities and nonlinear optical performances.
The striking chemical variability of hybrid organic-inorganic metal halides (HOMHs) endows them with fascinating optoelectronic properties. The inorganic skeletons of HOMHs are often flexible and their lattice deformations could serve as an effective factor for enabling the functionalities of HOMHs. Here, the linear and nonlinear optical properties of zero-dimensional (0D) tin(iv) halides have been tuned by structural distortion facilitated by the chiral amines. Enantiopure alpha-methylbenzyl ammoniums (XMBA, X = Cl, F) effectively transfer their chirality to the inorganic scaffolds when forming the tin(iv) halides, which enables polar arrangements in their crystals and leads to outstanding second-order nonlinear optical performances. In contrast, the racemic mixture of R- and S-FMBA results in the formation of HOMHs with room temperature phosphorescence. The lower lattice deformation in (rac-FMBA)(2)SnCl6 restrains the non-radiative decay from electron-phonon coupling and facilitates the photoluminescence. Meanwhile, the marked pi-pi interaction stabilizes the T-1 state for phosphorescent emission. These distinct linear and nonlinear optical properties denote the important role that the lattice distortion plays in tuning the optical properties of low-dimensional HOMHs, and offer a promising perspective of 0D tin(iv) halides for applications in optoelectronic materials and devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据