4.8 Article

Novel configuration of bifunctional air electrodes for rechargeable zinc-air batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 313, 期 -, 页码 37-45

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.02.063

关键词

Rechargeable zinc-air battery; alpha-MnO2/XC-72; Fe0.1Ni0.9Co2O4; Ti mesh; Charge-discharge cycle

资金

  1. National Science Council, Taiwan [NSC 102-3113-P-194-003, 102-2221-E-007-120-MY3]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST 104-3113-E-194-002, 105-3113-E- 194-002, 104-3113-E-006-005]
  3. Lower Carbon Energy Research Center in NTHU

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel configuration of two electrodes containing electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) pressed into a bifunctional air electrode is designed for rechargeable Zn-air batteries. MOC/25BC carbon paper (MOC consisting of alpha-MnO2 and XC-72 carbon black) and Fe0.1Ni0.9Co2O4/Ti mesh on this air electrode mainly serve as the cathode for the ORR and the anode for the OER, respectively. The morphology and physicochemical properties of Fe0.1Ni0.9Co2O4 are investigated through scanning electron microscopy, inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry, and X-ray diffraction. Electrochemical studies comprise linear sweep voltammetry, rotating ring-disk electrode voltammetry, and the full-cell charge-discharge-cycling test. The discharge peak power density of the Zn-air battery with the unique air electrode reaches 88.8 mW cm(-2) at 133.6 mA cm(-2) and 0.66 V in an alkaline electrolyte under an ambient atmosphere. After 100 charge-discharge cycles at 10 mA cm(-2), an increase of 0.3 V between charge and discharge cell voltages is observed. The deep charge-discharge curve (10 h in each step) indicates that the cell voltages of discharge (1.3 V) and charge (1.97 V) remain constant throughout the process. The performance of the proposed rechargeable Zn-air battery is superior to that of most other similar batteries reported in recent studies. (c) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据