4.8 Article

Interface and grain boundary resistance of a lithium lanthanum titanate (Li3xLa2/3-xTiO3, LLTO) solid electrolyte

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 307, 期 -, 页码 578-586

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.01.002

关键词

Lithium-air battery; Solid electrolyte; Liquid/solid interface; Impedance spectroscopy; Aqueous Lithium-air cell; Four-point measurement

资金

  1. BMBF Project [03X4634D]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Advanced experimental setups and measurement techniques are crucial for investigating and systematically improving interface characteristics. In this study we introduce an interface-cell, which allows the systematic analysis of liquid/solid electrolyte interfaces via four-point measurements. The functionality of this setup is demonstrated by analysing the impact of parameter variations on the aqueous interface of lithium lanthanum titanate (Li3xLa2/3-x-TiO3, LLTO) solid electrolytes as used in Lithium-air batteries. By variation of real operating conditions their impact on cycling performance is highlighted. Examples include temperature (0 to +25 degrees C) and state of charge (SoC), which induces an alteration of pH (here pH approximate to 6-14) and Li+-concentration (here 0.057 mol L-1 to 10.62 mol L-1). Interestingly, a change of the polarization resistance greater than two orders of magnitude (250 Omega cm(2)-25,000 Omega cm(2)) could be identified. The proven dependency of the interface to both the pH and Li+-concentration is explained by an H+/Li+-exchange reaction at the LLTO/H2O-interface. Additionally, we were able to determine the solely grain boundary resistance (similar to 250 Omega cm(2) at 25 degrees C) of the LLTO samples, without the impact of blocking electrodes. A temperature variation revealed the activation energies of the processes to be 0.4 eV (grain boundary) and 0.46 eV (interface). These results were then critically evaluated in the context of aqueous Lithium-air batteries. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据