4.8 Article

A stepwise recovery of metals from hybrid cathodes of spent Li-ion batteries with leaching-flotation-precipitation process

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 325, 期 -, 页码 555-564

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.06.072

关键词

Spent Li-ion battery; Cathode recycling; Metal recovery; Acid leaching; Flotation; Precipitation

资金

  1. National Science Fund for Young Scholars of China [51404213, 51404214]
  2. Development Fund for Outstanding Young Teachers of Zhengzhou University [1421324065]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The recovering of valuable metals in spent lithium-ion battery cathodes brings about economic and environmental benefits. A stepwise leaching-flotation-precipitation process is adopted to separate and recover Li/Fe/Mn from the mixed types of cathode materials (hybrid wastes of LiFePO4 and LiMn2O4). The optimal operating conditions for the stepwise recovery process are determined and analyzed by factorial design, thermodynamics calculation, XRD and SEM characterization in this study. First, Li/Fe/Mn ions are released from the cathode using HCI assisted with H2O2 in the acid leaching step. The leachability of metals follows the series Li > Fe > Mn in the acidic environment. Then Fe3+ ions are selectively floated and recovered as FeCl3 from the leachate in the flotation step. Finally, Mn2+/Mn3+ and Li+ ions are sequentially precipitated and separated as MnO2/Mn2O3 and Li3PO4 using saturated KMnO4 solution and hot saturated Na3PO4 solution, respectively. Under the optimized and advisable conditions, the total recovery of Li, Fe and Mn is respectively 80.93 +/- 0.16%, 85.40 +/- 0.12% and 81.02 +/- 0.08%. The purity for lithium, ferrum and manganese compounds is respectively 99.32 +/- 0.07%, 97.91 +/- 0.05% and 98.73 +/- 0.05%. This stepwise process could provide an alternative way for the effective separation and recovery of metal values from spent Li-ion battery cathodes in industry. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据