4.8 Article

Edge effects in vertically-oriented graphene based electric double-layer capacitors

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 324, 期 -, 页码 309-316

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.05.072

关键词

Edge effects; Density functional theory; Molecular dynamics; Vertically-oriented graphenes; Electric double-layer capacitors

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51306159]
  2. Foundation of National Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of China [201238]
  3. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20120101120140]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vertically-oriented graphenes (VGs) have been demonstrated as a promising active material for electric double-layer capacitors (EDLCs), partially due to their edge-enriched structure. In this work, the 'edge effects', i.e., edges as the promoters of high capacitance, in VG based EDLCs are investigated with experimental research and numerical simulations. VGs with diverse heights (i.e., edge-to-basal ratios) and edge densities are prepared with varying the plasma-enabled growth time and employing different plasma sources. Electrochemical measurements show that the edges play a predominant role on the charge storage behavior of VGs. A simulation is further conducted to unveil the roles of the edges on the separation and adsorption of ions within VG channels. The initial charge distribution of a VG plane is obtained with density functional theory (DFT) calculations, which is subsequently applied to a molecular dynamics (MD) simulation system to gain the insights into the microscope EDLC structures. Compared with the basal planes, the edges present higher initial charge density (by 4.2 times), higher ion packing density (by 2.6 times), closer ion packing location (by 0.8 angstrom), and larger ion separation degree (by 14%). The as-obtained findings will be instructive in designing the morphology and structure of VGs for enhanced capacitive performances. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据