4.8 Article

Highly efficient sulfonated polybenzimidazole as a proton exchange membrane for microbial fuel cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 317, 期 -, 页码 143-152

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.03.103

关键词

Microbial fuel cell; Proton exchange membrane; Sulfonated polybenzimidazole; Proton transport; Water nanochannels

资金

  1. SERB, Govt. of India [SB/S1/PC-054/2013]
  2. CSIR
  3. Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India [DST/IMRCO/New INDIGO/Bio-e-MAT/2014/(G/ii)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although microbial fuel cells (MFCs) represent a promising bio-energy technology with a dual advantage (i.e., electricity production and waste-water treatment), their low power densities and high installation costs are major impediments. To address these bottlenecks and replace highly expensive Nafion, which is a proton exchange membrane (PEM), the current study focuses for the first time on membranes made from an easily synthesizable and more economical oxy-polybenzimidazole (OPBI) and its sulfonated analogue (S-OPBI) as alternate PEMs in single-chambered MFCs. The S-OPBI membrane exhibits better properties, with high water uptake, ion exchange capacity (IEC) and proton conductivity and a comparatively smaller degree of swelling compared to Nafion. The membrane morphology is characterized by atomic force microscopy, and the bright and dark regions of the S-OPBI membrane reveals the formation of ionic domains in the matrix, forming continuous water nanochannels when doped with water. These water-filled nanochannels are responsible for faster proton conduction in S-OPBI than in Nafion; therefore, the power output in the MFC with S-OPBI as the PEM is higher than in other MFCs. The open circuit voltage (460 mV), current generation (2.27 mA) and power density profile (110 mW/m(2)) as a function of time, as well as the polarization curves, exhibits higher current and power density (87.8 mW/m(2)) with S-OPBI compared to Nafion as the PEM. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据