4.8 Article

Superior performance of asymmetric supercapacitor based on reduced graphene oxide-manganese carbonate as positive and sono-chemically reduced graphene oxide as negative electrode materials

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 303, 期 -, 页码 222-233

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.10.107

关键词

Manganese carbonate; Reduced graphene oxide; Sono-chemical reaction; Supercapacitor; Asymmetric device

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi, India
  2. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi, India [ESC0112/RP-II]
  3. R&D Convergence Program of MSIP (Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning) of Republic of Korea [CAP-13-2-ETRI]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel strategy to synthesize hierarchical rod like MnCO3 on the reduced graphene oxide (RGO) sheets by a facile and cost-effective hydrothermal method is demonstrated. The chelating action of citric acid facilitates the formation a complex intermediate of Mn2+ and citrate ions, which finally results a 3D MnCO3/RGO (MRGO) composite with high electrical conductivity (similar to 1056 S m(-1)), good surface area (59 m(2) g(-1)) and high pore volume (0.3 cm(3) g(-1)). The specific capacitance (SC) of the MRGO composite is similar to 1120 F g(-1) at a current density of 2 A g(-1) in three electrode system. An asymmetric device has been designed with MRGO as positive and sono-chemically reduced RGO (SRGO) as negative electrode material. The asymmetric device (MRGO//SRGO) shows the SC of similar to 318 F g(-1) (at 2 A g(-1)) and energy density of similar to 113 W h kg(-1) (at 1600 W kg(-1)). The true energy density (1.7 W h kg(-1)) has been calculated considering the total weight of the device. The MRGO//SRGO device can power a wall clock for similar to 13 min after full charging. The Nyquist plot of the asymmetric cell has been simulated with Z-View software to measure the solution resistance, charge-transfer resistance and Warburg elements. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据