4.7 Article

Hybrid immunity and protection against infection during the Omicron wave in Malta

期刊

EMERGING MICROBES & INFECTIONS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2022.2156814

关键词

COVID-19; vaccines; hybrid immunity; public health; omicron (B; 1; 529)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Administration of the third dose of COVID-19 vaccinations coincided with the spread of the Omicron variant in Europe by December 2021. A study in Malta showed that participants with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection had lower odds of being infected with the Omicron variant. The timing of infection and vaccination played a role in reducing the odds of infection.
By December 2021, administration of the third dose of COVID-19 vaccinations coincided with the spread of the Omicron variant in Europe. Questions had been raised on protection against infection conferred by previous vaccination and/or infection. Our study population included 252,433 participants from the COVID-19 vaccination registry in Malta. Data were then matched with the national testing database. We collected vaccination status, vaccine brand, vaccination date, infection history, and age. Using logistic regression, we examined different combinations of vaccine dose, prior infection status and time, and the odds of infection during the period when the Omicron variant was the dominant variant in Malta. Participants infected with Sars-Cov-2 prior to the Omicron wave had a significantly lower odds of being infected with the Omicron variant. Additionally, the more recent the infection and the more recent the vaccination, the lower the odds of infection. Receiving a third dose within 20 weeks of the start of the Omicron wave in Malta offered similar odds of infection as receiving a second dose within the same period. Time since vaccination was a strong determinant against infection, as was previous infection status and the number of doses taken. This finding reinforces the importance of future booster dose provision especially to vulnerable populations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据