4.6 Article

Catalytic Wet Peroxide Oxidation of Anionic Pollutants over Fluorinated Fe3O4 Microspheres at Circumneutral pH Values

期刊

CATALYSTS
卷 12, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/catal12121564

关键词

magnetite; fluorination; wastewater treatment; Fenton-like oxidation; anionic dyes; adsorption

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. [21571146]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fluorinated Fe3O4 microspheres were prepared and shown to exhibit enhanced catalytic activity in the wet peroxide oxidation of anionic dyes. The fluorination effect was less pronounced for amphoteric dyes and had no effect on cationic dyes. The enhanced activity was attributed to increased isoelectric point and facilitated adsorption and degradation of anionic dyes.
Fluorinated Fe3O4 microspheres with 7.1 +/- 1.4 wt% of fluoride (F-Fe3O4-1) were prepared via glycothermal synthesis. Fluorination significantly enhanced the activity of F-Fe3O4-1 in catalytic wet peroxide oxidation of anionic dyes (including orange G (OG) and congo red) at pH similar to 7. However, the promotional effect of fluorination became less obvious for amphoteric rhodamine B and was not observed for cationic methylene blue. After reacting with H2O2 (40 mM) for 2 h at pH 6.5 and 40 degrees C, the decolorization rates of OG (0.1 mM) and the pseudo-first-order rate constant were 96.8% and 0.0284 min(-1) over F-Fe3O4-1 versus 17.6% and 0.0011 min(-1) over unmodified Fe3O4. The effects of reaction parameters (initial H2O2 concentration and pH value and reaction temperature) on OG decolorization with H2O2 over F-Fe3O4-1 were investigated. The reusability of F-Fe3O4-1 was demonstrated by OG decolorization in eight consecutive runs. Fluorination increased the isoelectric point of F-Fe3O4-1 to 8.7 and facilitated the adsorption and degradation of anionic dyes on the surface of F-Fe3O4-1 at pH similar to 7. Scavenging tests and EPR spectra supported that hydroxyl radicals were the main reactive species for the OG decolorization over F-Fe3O4-1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据