Sex and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival: a systematic review

Background: The literature is unresolved on whether female receive advanced cardiac life support less than do male and on whether female have a survival advantage over male after cardiopulmonary resuscitation.Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases (from inception to 23-April -2022) for papers reporting outcomes in adult male and female after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The main study outcome was the rate of adjusted survival to hospital discharge or 30 days. Secondary outcomes included unadjusted survival to hospital discharge and favourable neurological outcome. Results: A total of 28 studies were included, involving 1,931,123 patients. Female were older than male, their car-diac arrests were less likely to be witnessed and less likely to present with a shockable rhythm. Unadjusted analysis showed that females had a lower likelihood of survival than males (OR 0.68 [0.62-0.74], I-2 = 97%). After adjustment, no significant difference was identified between male and female in survival at hospital discharge/30 days (OR 1.01 [0.93-1.11], I-2 = 87%). Data showed that male had a significantly higher likelihood of favorable neurological outcome in unadjusted analysis but this trend disappeared after adjustment. Both the primary outcome (adjusted for several variables) and the secondary outcomes were associated with substantial heterogeneity. The variables examined using meta-regression, subgroup and sensitivity analyses (i.e., study type, location, years, population, quality of adjustment, risk of bias) did not reduce heterogeneity.Conclusions: The adjusted rate of survival to hospital discharge/30 days was similar for male and female despite an initial seeming survival advantage for male. The validity of this finding is limited by substantial heterogeneity despite in-depth investigation of its causes, which raises concerns regarding latent inequalities in some reports nonetheless. Further study on this topic may require inclusion of factors not reported in the Utstein template and in-depth analysis of decision-mak ing processes.

Automated summary

There is currently no consensus on whether females receive less advanced cardiac life support than males or whether females have a survival advantage over males after cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The study found that, although females had a lower likelihood of survival than males in unadjusted analysis, there was no significant difference after adjustment. However, the results were associated with substantial heterogeneity, raising concerns about potential inequalities.