期刊
WORLD JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY SURGERY
卷 18, 期 1, 页码 -出版社
BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13017-023-00479-7
关键词
Necrotizing pancreatitis; Network meta-analysis; Intervention; Randomized controlled trials; Mortality
This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of different treatment strategies for necrotizing pancreatitis through a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. Delayed surgery, delayed surgical step-up approach, and delayed endoscopic step-up approach showed better results in reducing mortality, while delayed surgical step-up approach and delayed endoscopic step-up approach were more effective in reducing major complications. Drainage alone should be avoided, and interventions should be postponed if possible.
Background A series of randomized controlled trials have investigated the efficacy and safety of different timings of interventions and methods of intervention. However, the optimal treatment strategy is not yet clear. Methods We searched PubMed, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov and the Cochrane Library until November 30, 2022. A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis were performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Trials comparing different treatment strategies for necrotizing pancreatitis were included. This study was registered in the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42022364409) to ensure transparency. Results We analyzed a total of 10 studies involving 570 patients and 8 treatment strategies. Although no statistically significant differences were identified comparing odds ratios, trends were confirmed by the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) scores. The interventions with a low rate of mortality were delayed surgery (DS), delayed surgical step-up approach (DSU) and delayed endoscopic step-up approach (DEU), while the interventions with a low rate of major complications were DSU, DEU and DS. According to the clustered ranking plot, DSU performed the best overall in reducing mortality and major complications, while DD performed the worst. Analysis of the secondary endpoints confirmed the superiority of DEU and DSU in terms of individual components of major complications (organ failure, pancreatic fistula, bleeding, and visceral organ or enterocutaneous fistula), exocrine insufficiency, endocrine insufficiency and length of stay. Overall, DSU was superior to other interventions. Conclusion DSU was the optimal treatment strategy for necrotizing pancreatitis. Drainage alone should be avoided in clinical practice. Any interventions should be postponed for at least 4 weeks if possible. The step-up approach was preferred.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据