4.8 Article

Novel application of differential thermal voltammetry as an in-depth state-of-health diagnosis method for lithium-ion batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 307, 期 -, 页码 308-319

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.12.122

关键词

Lithium-ion battery; Degradation; State-of-Health; Differential thermal voltammetry; Stoichiometric drift

资金

  1. Climate KIC
  2. EPSRC through Career Acceleration Fellowship [EP/I00422X/1]
  3. Low Carbon Grids Project [EP/K002252/1]
  4. ESRN Energy Storage Research Network project
  5. FUTURE vehicles project [EP/I038586/1]
  6. EPSRC [EP/K002252/1, EP/I00422X/1, EP/I038586/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K002252/1, EP/I00422X/1, EP/I038586/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding and tracking battery degradation mechanisms and adapting its operation have become a necessity in order to enhance battery durability. A novel use of differential thermal voltammetry (DTV) is presented as an in-situ state-of-health (SOH) estimator for lithium-ion batteries. Accelerated ageing experiments were carried on 5Ah commercial lithium-ion polymer cells operated and stored at different temperature and loading conditions. The cells were analysed regularly with various existing in-situ diagnosis methods and the novel DTV technique to determine their SOH. The diagnosis results were used collectively to elaborate the degradation mechanisms inside the cells. The DTV spectra were decoupled into individual peaks, which each represent particular phases in the negative and positive electrode combined. The peak parameters were used to quantitatively analyse the battery SOH. A different cell of the same chemistry with unknown degradation history was then analysed to explore how the cell degraded. The DTV technique was able to diagnose the cell degradation without relying on supporting results from other methods nor previous cycling data. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据