4.5 Article

Anatomic Comparison of Contralateral Maxillary Second Molars Using High-Resolution Micro-CT

期刊

SYMMETRY-BASEL
卷 15, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/sym15020420

关键词

micro-CT; maxillary molar; root canal configuration; bilateral symmetry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study used micro-CT to measure and compare anatomic parameters in contralateral maxillary second molars. The results showed a high degree of symmetry in linear measurements and root canal anatomy configuration. A significant proportion of the roots had lateral canals, with the apical third being the most common location. This study provides valuable insight into the root canal anatomy of contralateral maxillary second molars.
The present study aimed to measure and compare anatomic parameters in contralateral maxillary second molars. A total of 18 intact maxillary second molar pairs (n = 36) extracted from 18 patients were scanned with micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) and then reconstructed. Axial, sagittal, and cross-sectional slices were used to analyze the parameters (lengths, widths, and thicknesses) and evaluate the symmetry of the right and left sides. The number of root canals and their internal patterns were classified following Vertucci's classification. The number of lateral canals and their locations were also noted. Contralateral second molar pairs demonstrated a high degree of similarity in terms of the linear measurements (lengths, widths, and thicknesses). The root canal anatomy configuration symmetry of mesiobuccal, distobuccal, and palatal roots according to Vertucci's classification were 41.1%, 88.2%, and 94.4%, respectively. In total, 41.6% of mesiobuccal roots, 2.7% of distobuccal roots, and 30.6% of palatal roots had at least one lateral canal. The apical third (38.7%) was the most frequent location of lateral canals, followed by the middle third (32.3%) of the root. This study provides insight into the anatomy of the root canals of contralateral maxillary second molars, which is valuable for both practitioners and researchers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据