4.6 Article

Effect of Artificial Reefs on the Alimentary Strategies of Two Mediterranean Sea Teleosts

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su15010011

关键词

anti-trawling reefs; feeding habit; stomach contents; Mediterranean Sea

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the researchers investigated the effect of anti-trawling reefs on the feeding ecology of fish in Punta Tramontana, Sardinia. They examined the stomach contents of two fish species and found that the installation of artificial reefs increased the food spectrum availability for one species and induced different feeding behaviors. However, the reefs had no negative environmental impact on the marine biota.
In this study, we aimed to investigate the presence of an alteration in the feeding ecology of fish after the deployment of anti-trawling reefs at the Punta Tramontana site (Sardinia, Italy). To achieve this aim, we examined prey in the stomach contents of two target species of fish: Diplodus annularis and Mullus surmuletus. The samples were obtained from fishing activities carried out over one year from June 2017 to October 2018 at two impact sites, selected by the presence of artificial reefs, and two control sites. The results showed that installing these artificial devices increased the food spectrum availability of the target species and induced two different ecological feeding behaviors, probably derived from their different ecologies. D. annularis changed its alimentary strategy from generalist at control sites to specialist at impact sites, focusing its diet on the crustacean Gnathia maxillaris. Mullus surmuletus was not affected by the presence of the barriers, which constitute an additional site where the fish feed during their foraging activities. In conclusion, these anti-trawling reefs, in addition to the purpose for which they are designed (in this case, avoiding illegal trawling), did not produce any negative environmental impact on surrounding marine biota.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据