4.6 Article

Spatial Inequalities in Access to Micromobility Services: An Analysis of Moped-Style Scooter Sharing Systems in Barcelona

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 15, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su15032096

关键词

free-floating systems; geofence; micromobility; shared mobility; moped-style scooter sharing; inequality

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the determinants of spatial coverage of four moped-style scooter sharing services in Barcelona and finds that centrality, household disposable income, and topography are the main factors influencing the coverage. The results highlight the importance of public sector involvement in designing the spatial coverage areas to ensure equity and transportation justice and avoid exclusion of less attractive areas by private sector designs.
Micromobility services hold substantial potential in terms of promoting shared and electric-powered mobility modes, however, little is known about their accessibility and what shapes their spatial coverage. These two issues are important to understand how socially equitable these modes can really be and how public policies should manage their implementation in urban areas. Hence, this study examines the determinants of the spatial coverage of four moped-style scooter sharing services (MSS) in Barcelona. The article examines the socio-territorial characteristics of the coverage areas of each MSS, as defined in 2019, together with the minimum area that operators had to provide service in 2020 according to the local regulation. For each MSS, a binomial generalized linear mixed model is employed to predict the odds of each cadastral parcel being covered by the service and analyzed the main spatial determinants associated with it. The results suggest that territorial coverage is defined by centrality, household disposable income, and topography, with low-accessibility areas consistently omitted from services. The conclusions underline the need for the public sector to participate in the design of spatial coverage areas of MSS to guarantee spatial equity and transportation justice and avoid private sector designs that systematically exclude less attractive areas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据