4.6 Article

Decision Making Model for Identifying the Cyber Technology Implementation Benefits for Sustainable Residential Building: A Mathematical PLS-SEM Approach

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 15, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su15032458

关键词

cyber technology; sustainability; residential building projects; PLS-SEM; benefits; EFA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explored and categorized the benefits of implementing cyber technology in the Nigerian construction sector through survey questionnaires. The results showed that transparency-related benefits were crucial for using cyber technology. The study's findings will serve as a reference for decision-makers aiming to decrease costs and increase sustainability in the Nigerian building industry by adopting cyber technology.
Sustainability principles should be implemented during all the phases of the decision-making process of constructing residential buildings to achieve maximum gains without compromising the function of such projects. This study identified and examined the benefits of implementing cyber technology in residential building projects, with a view to promoting the sustainability of such projects. The benefits of cyber technology were identified from previous studies, which were then contextually explored via survey questionnaires within the Nigerian building industry. The results from the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) technique showed that the cyber technology benefits could be categorized into five constructs, namely, planning, transparency, efficiency, productivity, and quality. In addition, partial least square structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) was used to develop the benefits model. The results showed that transparency related benefits were crucial benefits for implementing cyber technology. The study's results will serve as a reference for decision-makers looking to decrease costs and increase sustainability by using cyber technology in the Nigerian construction sector.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据