4.6 Article

Multi-Criteria Decision Methods for Selecting a Wind Farm Site Using a Geographic Information System (GIS)

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 14, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su142214742

关键词

wind energy; GIS; site selection; multi-criteria decision method; windfarm

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wind energy is an attractive option in terms of economics, technology, and environment. Subsidies for fossil fuels have been the major obstacle to developing renewable resources in Iran. This study used a multi-criteria decision method to identify wind energy potential in Khuzestan province. The results show different cities have the most potential from economic and technical viewpoints.
Wind energy is an economically, technically, and environmentally attractive option due to its cheapness and availability in different regions. The most important obstacle to developing renewable resources in Iran is subsidies for fossil fuels. The Iranian government has recently decided to reduce subsidies for electricity and fossil fuels, which has led to an increase in the prices of fossil fuels and electricity and makes renewable technologies more attractive to use. This study uses a multi-criteria decision method to identify wind energy potential in Khuzestan province. A GIS is used to determine the wind energy potential in this province. The technical, environmental, and economic criteria, which are a total of 14 layers of information, were examined by considering different values for each and from a Boolean point of view. The results show that, from the economic point of view, Shadegan city has the most potential and, from the technical point of view, Khorramshahr city has the highest amount of electricity production through wind energy. Furthermore, Dasht-e Azadegan city, due to its population, can supply the maximum amount of electricity it needs through wind energy. Among the three 550, 2500, and 8000 kW turbines, the 550 kW turbine has the most potential in the region.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据