4.6 Article

Multidimensional Indicators to Assess the Sustainability of Demersal Small-Scale Fishery in the Azores

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 14, 期 24, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su142416585

关键词

FPI; triple bottom line; sustainability indicators; bottom longline fishery; demersal species; NE Atlantic

资金

  1. European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF) through the Regional Government of the Azores under the MAR2020 operational program
  2. FCT
  3. [UI/BD/153596/2022]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The demersal fishery sector in the Azores plays a crucial role in community livelihood, with good ecological and economic performance but room for improvement, particularly in addressing landing volatility and reducing dependency on subsidies.
The Azorean demersal fishery sector is one of the most important in the archipelago. As a small-scale fishery, it plays an important role in the livelihood of the community, being a source of employment and income, and contributing to poverty alleviation. Because fisheries are a complex system, a multidisciplinary approach that includes socioeconomic indicators is required for a broader assessment of fishery sustainability. This study analyzes the Azorean bottom longline fishery using the Fishery Performance Indicators tool, regarding its ecology, economy, and community indicators. The findings indicated that the fishery is mostly sustainable, although there is still opportunity for improvement. Its ecological indicators had a good performance, mainly due to the effort and work of the scientific community that makes continuous studies to examine the state of its stocks. The economic indicators are in good condition as well, but some obstacles stopped the indicator from obtaining a better performance; mainly the landing volatility and the fishery's main source of capital (subsidies), which can make the fishery less competitive. Finally, its community indicator had a very good performance, which reflects the fishery's socioeconomic and cultural relevance for the Azores.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据