4.6 Article

Life Cycle Assessment of Protection Products for External Thermal Insulation Composite Systems

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 14, 期 24, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su142416969

关键词

ETICS; life-cycle assessment (LCA); life-cycle cost (LCC); protection; sustainability

资金

  1. FCT-Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia, I.P., Portugal
  2. Research unit Civil Engineering Research and Innovation for Sustainability-CERI [PTDC/ECI-EGC/30681/2017]
  3. [UIDB/04625/2020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to quantify the environmental and economic impacts of different ETICS protection solutions and demonstrate the influence of weights on the results through multicriteria analysis.
The energy performance and thermal comfort of buildings are decisive factors for users. Thus, solutions such as the external thermal insulation systems (ETICS) that can be installed in either new buildings or buildings under thermal retrofitting, reducing the energy consumption while improving thermal comfort, tend to become mainstream. This paper purposes to quantify the environmental and economic impacts of various ETICS protection solutions to assist in decision-making at the project phase. In this study, products available on the Portuguese market are considered. The protection products considered are hydrophobic agents, biocides, multifunctional, and self-cleaning. The products are compared by type of protection, presenting some of the most impactful components, following a multicriteria analysis of some of those products gathered into different solutions, with the objective of demonstrating the influence of the weights assigned to environmental and economic indicators. Several data-linked problems were identified, such as the quantity and quality of data available for analysis, crucial to their reliability; thus, an index for quality of information was developed in order to compare different products. In the multicriteria analysis, the weights of the sensitivity analysis between environmental and economic indicators highly influence the best solution; therefore, stakeholders need to clearly define their objectives.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据