4.6 Article

How Can the Digital Economy and Human Capital Improve City Sustainability

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 14, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su142315617

关键词

digital economy; human capital; city sustainability; fixed-effect model; panel threshold regression model

资金

  1. National Social Science Foundation of China
  2. University Scientific Research Program for Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region of China
  3. [21XRK007]
  4. [XJEDU2021S1002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the introduction of the digital age and urbanization in China, the digital economy (DE) has become an important factor in driving city sustainability (SUS). The impact of DE on SUS is influenced by the level of human capital (HC) accumulation and development. This study finds that DE has a significant positive effect on SUS, with a single threshold of HC. In areas with low HC levels, DE inhibits SUS, while in areas with high HC levels, DE particularly promotes SUS. The role of DE on SUS varies across different regions.
With the advent of the digital age and urbanization in China, the digital economy (DE) has gradually become a new engine for city sustainability (SUS). DE and SUS rely on human capital (HC) accumulation and development. It is necessary to study the linear and non-linear impact of DE on SUS, and the moderating effect of HC on the relationship between DE and SUS. The data of 278 prefecture-level cities from 2011 to 2019 were collected. The fixed-effect model and panel threshold regression model were adopted. The results show that DE can significantly promote SUS, and there is a single threshold of HC. In areas with a low level of HC, DE significantly inhibits SUS, and in areas with a high level of HC, DE particularly promotes SUS. There is a regional heterogeneity about the role of DE on SUS. The innovation is that DE, HC, and SUS are first brought into the same research framework. Furthermore, the impact of specific stages of HC development on the relationship between DE and SUS was quantitatively investigated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据