4.6 Article

Electrolysis of Bacteria Based on Microfluidic Technology

期刊

MICROMACHINES
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/mi14010144

关键词

cell lysis; E; coli; microfluidic; AC electric field; electroporation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cell lysis is an important step for protein research and various applications such as drug screening and cancer diagnosis. Current cell lysis methods have limitations, prompting the need for a fast, chemical-free, portable, and non-invasive device. In this study, an integrated microfluidic chip was designed to achieve E. coli lysis using an alternating current electric field, and the effects of voltage, frequency, and flow rate on lysis efficiency were investigated. The study provided a simple and efficient method for bacteria lysis in biology and biomedical applications.
Cell lysis is a key step for studying the structure and function of proteins in cells and an important intermediate step in drug screening, cancer diagnosis, and genome analysis. The current cell lysis methods still suffer from limitations, such as the need for large instruments, a long and time-consuming process, a large sample volume, chemical reagent contamination, and their unsuitability for the small amount of bacteria lysis required for point-of-care testing (POCT) devices. Therefore, a fast, chemical-free, portable, and non-invasive device needs to be developed. In the present study, we designed an integrated microfluidic chip to achieve E. coli lysis by applying an alternating current (AC) electric field and investigated the effects of voltage, frequency, and flow rate on the lysis. The results showed that the lysis efficiency of the bacteria was increased with a higher voltage, lower frequency, and lower flow rate. When the voltage was at 10 Vp-p, the lysis efficiency was close to 100%. The study provided a simple, rapid, reagent-free, and high-efficiency cleavage method for biology and biomedical applications involving bacteria lysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据