4.6 Article

All-small-molecule efficient ternary organic solar cells employing a coumarin donor and two fullerene-free acceptors

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
卷 11, 期 5, 页码 1919-1926

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2tc05318g

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Organic solar cells with ternary bulk heterojunction active layers composed of small molecules provide a simple and efficient approach to enhance power conversion efficiencies. In this study, all-small-molecule ternary OSCs were constructed using a medium bandgap IDT-IC, a narrow bandgap F13, and a wide bandgap C1-CN. The crystalline nature of IDT-IC induced appropriate nanoscale in the C1-CN:F13 film, resulting in a higher PCE of 15.54% compared to C1-CN:F13 (14.23%) and C1-CN:IDT-IC (6.17%).
Organic solar cells (OSCs) prepared from ternary bulk heterojunction active layers offer a simplistic and proficient tactic for enhancing power conversion efficiencies (PCEs). Herein, we report the construction of all-small-molecule ternary OSCs using a medium bandgap IDT-IC and a narrow bandgap F13 as fullerene-free molecular acceptors along with a wide bandgap C1-CN as a molecular donor. The crystalline nature of IDT-IC induces the appropriate nanoscale in the range of the exciton diffusion length in the C1-CN:F13 binary film, resulting in a higher PCE of 15.54% than that for C1-CN:F13 (14.23%) and C1-CN:IDT-IC (6.17%). Although the open circuit voltage (V-OC) for the C1-CN:IDT-IC:F13 ternary organic solar cell is lower than that for C1-CN:F13, the improved PCE is mainly due to the increased values of short circuit current and fill factor. The improvement in the fill factor may be attributed to the enhanced charge transport and minimal recombination loss due to the enhanced phase separation in the ternary films. The increase in the short circuit current is attributed to the increased interfacial area for exciton dissociation and the effective utilization of excitons via the energy transfer for IDT-IC to F13.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据