4.7 Article

A Bayesian Approach for Joint Discriminative Dictionary and Classifier Learning

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSMC.2022.3170443

关键词

Dictionaries; Bayes methods; Codes; Machine learning; Sparse matrices; Training; Face recognition; Dictionary learning; image classification; sparse Bayesian learning; sparse representation (SR)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U2141235, 61803168, U1713203, 51721092, 61751303, 51729501]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a joint dictionary and classifier learning algorithm that optimizes dictionaries and sparse codes using Gaussian priors to improve classification performance. The algorithm achieves group sparsity in sparse coding through Bayesian learning and Gaussian priors. Hyperparameters are optimized using an evidence maximization method without manual parameter tuning.
Sparse representation has been widely applied to image classification, where the key issue is to extract a suitable discriminative dictionary. To this end, we propose a joint dictionary and classifier learning algorithm based on a parameterized Bayesian model. Therein, the Gaussian priors of a dictionary endow it with the capability of discrimination and representation. Moreover, we introduce a multivariate Gaussian prior for the sparse codes to achieve group sparsity, thereby substantially improving the classification performance. Furthermore, the sparse codes are estimated by a group-sparse Bayesian learning (GSBL) method, and the dictionary atoms are updated sequentially by maximizing a posterior. Moreover, to avoid manual parameter adjustment, the hyperparameters are optimized by an evidence maximization method. Accordingly, we develop a classification scheme via GSBL. Finally, extensive experiments are conducted on six benchmark datasets of face classification, object recognition, handwritten recognition, and scene categorization to substantiate the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据