4.7 Article

Increasing PV Hosting Capacity With an Adjustable Hybrid Power Flow Model

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 409-422

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSTE.2022.3215287

关键词

Convexification; renewable; surrogate affine policy; uncertainty

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Physical constraints are necessary for integrating distributed energy resources, specifically PV, into the distribution network. The concept of hosting capacity (HC) is introduced to determine the maximum renewable energy generation that the distribution system can accommodate. This study proposes a hybrid adjustable power flow model to enhance the HC and effectively utilize flexible resources in a secure and cost-efficient manner. A novel hybrid relaxation approach is presented to convexify a two-stage AC model with variable uncertainty sets, and an iterative algorithm is developed to solve the problem. Case studies on a single-phase 141-node system and a three-phase 33-bus system demonstrate the promising performance of the proposed approach in terms of accuracy, convergence, and robustness.
Physical constraints must be enforced when distributed energy resources, such as PV, are integrated into distribution network. Hosting capacity (HC) is thus introduced to define the maximum renewable generation that distribution system can accommodate. When the grid is further pushed towards decarbonization, improving HC becomes even more important. This work presents a hybrid adjustable power flow model to increase the uncertainty-proof HC, aiming to securely and cost-effectively utilize flexible resources. We propose a novel hybrid relaxation approach to convexifying a two-stage AC model with variable uncertainty set. An iterative algorithm is designed to solve the problem. We perform the case study in a single-phase 141-node system and a three-phase 33-bus system. The proposed approach shows promising performance in accuracy, convergence, and robustness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据