4.6 Article

Toward A Regulatory Pathway for the Use of in Silico Trials in the CE Marking of Medical Devices

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JBHI.2022.3198145

关键词

Medical devices; Computational modeling; Europe; Biological system modeling; Animals; Safety; Drugs; Medical devices; in Silico Trials; regulatory system; notified bodies

资金

  1. European Commission through the H2020 Project In Silico World: Lowering barriers to ubiquitous adoption of In Silico Trials [101016503]
  2. European Commission [777123]
  3. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [777123] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In Silico Trials methodologies will have a significant impact on the development and risk reduction of medical devices in the future. The regulatory pathway for Digital Patient and Personal Health Forecasting solutions is clear, but more complex for In Silico Trials solutions. It is suggested that the European regulatory system should start an innovation process to avoid companies focusing on other markets like the USA.
In Silico Trials methodologies will play a growing and fundamental role in the development and de-risking of new medical devices in the future. While the regulatory pathway for Digital Patient and Personal Health Forecasting solutions is clear, it is more complex for In Silico Trials solutions, and therefore deserves a deeper analysis. In this position paper, we investigate the current state of the art towards the regulatory system for in silico trials applied to medical devices while exploring the European regulatory system toward this topic. We suggest that the European regulatory system should start a process of innovation: in principle to limit distorted quality by different internal processes within notified bodies, hence avoiding that the more innovative and competitive companies focus their attention on the needs of other large markets, like the USA, where the use of such radical innovations is already rapidly developing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据