4.8 Article

Structures of human dynein in complex with the lissencephaly 1 protein, LIS1

期刊

ELIFE
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

eLIFE SCIENCES PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.84302

关键词

dynein; Lis1; lissencephaly; cryo-electron microscopy; malformations of cortical development

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports the cryo-EM structures of human dynein-LIS1 complexes, revealing the differences between yeast and human systems. It provides a blueprint to disrupt the human dynein-LIS1 interactions more accurately and maps mutations linked to malformations of cortical development/intellectual disability and type-1 lissencephaly disease in the context of the dynein-LIS1 complex.
The lissencephaly 1 protein, LIS1, is mutated in type- 1 lissencephaly and is a key regulator of cytoplasmic dynein-1. At a molecular level, current models propose that LIS1 activates dynein by relieving its autoinhibited form. Previously we reported a 3.1 angstrom structure of yeast dynein bound to Pac1, the yeast homologue of LIS1, which revealed the details of their interactions (Gillies et al., 2022). Based on this structure, we made mutations that disrupted these interactions and showed that they were required for dynein's function in vivo in yeast. We also used our yeast dynein-Pac1 structure to design mutations in human dynein to probe the role of LIS1 in promoting the assembly of active dynein complexes. These mutations had relatively mild effects on dynein activation, suggesting that there may be differences in how dynein and Pac1/LIS1 interact between yeast and humans. Here, we report cryo-EM structures of human dynein-LIS1 complexes. Our new structures reveal the differences between the yeast and human systems, provide a blueprint to disrupt the human dynein-LIS1 interactions more accurately, and map type-1 lissencephaly disease mutations, as well as mutations in dynein linked to malformations of cortical development/intellec-tual disability, in the context of the dynein- LIS1 complex.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据