4.8 Article

Tree species and genetic diversity increase productivity via functional diversity and trophic feedbacks

期刊

ELIFE
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

eLIFE SCIENCES PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.78703

关键词

BEF; functional diversity; genetic diversity; productivity; trophic feedbacks; Other

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31870409, 32161123003]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB31000000]
  3. Younth Innovation Promotion Association CAS [2019082]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the impact of plant genetic diversity on plant productivity, and finds that tree species diversity increases tree productivity through increased tree functional diversity and reduced soil fungal diversity. Additionally, in mixed tree species plantations, tree genetic diversity has a positive effect on productivity.
Addressing global biodiversity loss requires an expanded focus on multiple dimensions of biodiversity. While most studies have focused on the consequences of plant interspecific diversity, our mechanistic understanding of how genetic diversity within plant species affects plant productivity remains limited. Here, we use a tree species x genetic diversity experiment to disentangle the effects of species diversity and genetic diversity on tree productivity, and how they are related to tree functional diversity and trophic feedbacks. We found that tree species diversity increased tree productivity via increased tree functional diversity, reduced soil fungal diversity, and marginally reduced herbivory. The effects of tree genetic diversity on productivity via functional diversity and soil fungal diversity were negative in monocultures but positive in the mixture of the four tree species tested. Given the complexity of interactions between species and genetic diversity, tree functional diversity and trophic feedbacks on productivity, we suggest that both tree species and genetic diversity should be considered in afforestation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据