4.6 Letter

Why epigenetics is (not) a biosocial science and why that matters

期刊

CLINICAL EPIGENETICS
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13148-022-01366-9

关键词

Epigenetics; Cardio-epigenetics; Post-genomics; Biosocial; Science and technology studies; Interdisciplinarity

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) [PZ00P1_185822]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PZ00P1_185822] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article explores the relationship between epigenetic modifications and the environmental etiology of complex diseases, highlighting some issues in current research. Using cardiovascular diseases as an example, the paper illustrates the reductionism in understanding epigenetic biomarkers, which hampers the pursuit of the goals of epigenetics.
Epigenetic modifications offer compelling evidence of the environmental etiology of complex diseases. Social and biographical conditions, as well as material exposures, all modulate our biology with consequences for risk predispositions and health conditions. Elucidating these complex biosocial loops is one of the main challenges animating epigenetics. Yet, research on the development of epigenetic biomarkers often pulls in a direction that departs from a view of biological determinants of health embedded in their social and material environment. Taking the example of the epigenetics of cardiovascular diseases, this paper illustrates how common understandings of epigenetic biomarkers strongly lean toward considering them as mere targets for molecular intervention, rather than as correlates of a complex biological and social patterning of disease. This reductionism about biosocial dynamics of disease, we argue, hampers the pursuit of the goals epigenetics has given itself (in cardiology and beyond). If epigenetic mechanisms point to the deep socio-environmental embeddedness of our health, we conclude, future designs and methods of this research may require an improved methodological consideration of a biosocial perspective.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据