4.3 Article

Evaluating the Impacts of CYP3A4*1B and CYP3A5*3 Variations on Pharmacokinetic Behavior and Clinical Outcomes in Multiple Myeloma Patients With Autologous Stem Cell Transplant

期刊

CANCER GENOMICS & PROTEOMICS
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 9-17

出版社

INT INST ANTICANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.21873/cgp.20360

关键词

Multiple myeloma; melphalan; pharmacokinetics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to evaluate the potential impacts of CYP3A4*1B and CYP3A5*3 gene variations on the pharmacokinetic properties of melphalan and clinical outcomes in multiple myeloma patients. The results showed that CYP3A4*1B/*1B and CYP3A5*3/*3 carriers had shorter median progression-free survival time and higher maximum melphalan plasma concentration. Through yet-to-be-identified mechanisms, CYP3A4*1B/*1B and CYP3A5*3/*3 variations might influence melphalan therapy in MM patients.
Background/Aim: There exists considerably large interpatient variability in pharmacokinetic exposure of high dose melphalan in multiple myeloma patients with hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the potential impacts of CYP3A4*1B (rs2940574) and CYP3A5*3 (rs776746) variations on pharmacokinetic properties of melphalan and clinical outcomes in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Patients and Methods: Genotypes of CYP3A4*1B (rs2940574) and CYP3A5*3 (rs776746) were determined by validated gene -specific real-time PCR (RT-PCR) assays using DNA samples from 108 MM patients; plasma concentrations of melphalan at different time points were quantified using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Results: CYP3A4*1B/*1B and CYP3A5*3/*3 carriers appeared to have a short median progression-free survival time and a higher maximum melphalan plasma concentration than non-carriers [792 vs. over 950 days, p=0.08; 9.91 (2.67, 34.03) vs. 8.66 (4.46, 17.61) mg/l, p=0.039]. Conclusion: CYP3A4*1B/*1B and CYP3A5*3/*3 variations might influence melphalan therapy in MM patients through yet-to-be-identified mechanisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据