4.5 Article

Evaluation of an Ocean Reanalysis System in the Indian and Pacific Oceans

期刊

ATMOSPHERE
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/atmos14020220

关键词

ocean reanalysis; ensemble optimal interpolation; data assimilation; independent observations; validation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper describes an ocean reanalysis system (IPORA) in the Indian and Pacific oceans and evaluates its quality in detail. The system uses assimilation schemes based on ensemble optimal interpolation in a hybrid coordinate ocean model to conduct a long-term reanalysis experiment from 1993 to 2020. The performance of IPORA is validated through comparisons with satellite sea surface temperature, altimetry data, observed currents, and other reanalyses. Compared to the control experiment, IPORA significantly reduces errors and improves interannual variability in temperature, salinity, sea level anomaly, and current fields. It also captures strong signals of sea level anomaly variability and reproduces the linear trend well.
This paper describes an ocean reanalysis system in the Indian and Pacific oceans (IPORA) and evaluates its quality in detail. The assimilation schemes based on ensemble optimal interpolation are employed in the hybrid coordinate ocean model to conduct a long-time reanalysis experiment during the period of 1993-2020. Different metrics including comparisons with satellite sea surface temperature, altimetry data, observed currents, as well as other reanalyses such as ECCO and SODA are used to validate the performance of IPORA. Compared with the control experiment without assimilation, IPORA greatly reduces the errors of temperature, salinity, sea level anomaly, and current fields, and improves the interannual variability. In contrast to ECCO and SODA products, IPORA captures the strong signals of SLA variability and reproduces the linear trend of SLA very well. Meanwhile, IPORA also shows a good consistence with observed currents, as indicated by an improved correlation and a reduced error.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据