4.5 Article

Investigation of the Parameters Influencing Baseline Ozone in the Western United States: A Statistical Modeling Approach

期刊

ATMOSPHERE
卷 13, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/atmos13111883

关键词

ozone; baseline ozone; statistical model; generalized additive model

资金

  1. National Science Foundation
  2. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [AGS-1447832]
  3. [RA-133R-16-SE-0758]
  4. [NA17OAR4320101]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study uses a statistical model to characterize daily peak 8-hour O-3 concentrations at a rural mountaintop research station in central Oregon. The results show that relative humidity, aerosol scattering, carbon monoxide, and water vapor mixing ratio significantly impact O-3 concentrations.
Ground-level ozone (O-3) is a key atmospheric gas that controls the oxidizing capacity of the atmosphere and has significant health and environmental implications. Due to ongoing reductions in the concentrations of O-3 precursors, it is important to assess the variables influencing baseline O-3 to inform pollution control strategies. This study uses a statistical model to characterize daily peak 8 h O-3 concentrations at the Mount Bachelor Observatory (MBO), a rural mountaintop research station in central Oregon, from 2006-2020. The model was constrained by seven predictive variables: year, day-of-year, relative humidity (RH), aerosol scattering, carbon monoxide (CO), water vapor (WV) mixing ratio, and tropopause pressure. RH, aerosol scattering, CO, and WV mixing ratio were measured at MBO, and tropopause pressure was measured via satellite. For the full 15-year period, the model represents 61% of the variance in daily peak 8 h O-3, and all predictive variables have a statistically significant (p < 0.05) impact on daily peak 8 h O-3 concentrations. Our results show that daily peak 8 h O-3 concentrations at MBO are well-predicted by the model, thereby providing insight into what affects baseline O-3 levels at a rural site on the west coast of North America.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据