4.6 Article

Cdk1 plays matchmaker for the Polo-like kinase and its activator SPAT-1/Bora

期刊

CELL CYCLE
卷 14, 期 15, 页码 2394-2398

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15384101.2015.1053673

关键词

Cell cycle; Mitosis; Embryo; C. elegans

资金

  1. PhD fellowship from Fondation ARC pour la Recherche sur le Cancer, the City of Paris
  2. Who am I? Laboratory of Excellence [ANR-11-LABX-0071]
  3. French Government through Investments for the Future program [ANR-11-IDEX-0005-01]
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation [31003A_156013]
  5. University of Geneva
  6. French National Research Agency [ANR-2012-BSV2-0001-01]
  7. Foundation for Medical Research Equipe FRM [DEQ20140329538]
  8. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [31003A_156013] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mitosis is orchestrated by several protein kinases including Cdks, Plks and Aurora kinases. Despite considerable progress toward understanding the individual function of these protein kinases, how their activity is coordinated in space and time during mitosis is less well understood. In a recent article published in the Journal of Cell Biology, we show that CDK-1 regulates PLK-1 activity during mitosis in C. elegans embryos through multisite phosphorylation of the PLK-1 activator SPAT-1 (Aurora Borealis, Bora in human). SPAT-1 variants mutated on CDK-1 phosphorylation sites results in severe delays in mitotic entry, mimicking embryos lacking spat-1 or plk-1 function. We further show that SPAT-1 phosphorylation by CDK-1 promotes its binding to PLK-1 and stimulates PLK-1 phosphorylation on its activator T-loop by Aurora A kinase in vitro. Likewise, we find that phosphorylation of Bora by Cdk1 promotes phosphorylation of human Plk1 by Aurora A suggesting that this mechanism is conserved in humans. These results indicate that Cdk1 regulates Plk1 by boosting its kinase activity. Here we discuss these recent findings and open questions regarding the regulation of Plk1/PLK-1 by Cdk1/CDK-1 and Bora/SPAT-1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据