Using Various Analysis Center Products to Assess the Time-Frequency Transfer Performance of GPS/Galileo/BDS PPPAR Methods

Numerous organizations and Analysis Centers (AC) currently offer various Ambiguity Resolution (AR) products using various methodologies. However, there are no associated studies on their use for time-frequency transfer. This paper examines 16 Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX) stations with external high-precision atomic clocks to constitute 15 international time comparison links, and uses AR products data from CNES, SGG, CODE, and PRIDE laboratories, using three ambiguity-fixed strategies, to thoroughly evaluate the effects of various strategies and AR products for high-precision time-frequency transfer. We reach the following results by using the IGS final clock product as a reference and comparing it to ambiguity-float. With various ambiguity-fixed procedures, the time stability Standard Deviation (STD) of time transfer is increased for a single GPS, and the improvement ranges from 10 to 40%. The frequency stability has barely improved; up to 40%, the most notable improvement comes from FCB with GRM products. The time stability STD of combinations has improved after the addition of the Galileo system compared to the single GPS, and the improvement ranges from 2 to 9%. Most strategies have been improved, while a few techniques have been weakened with the GEC (GPS + Galileo + BDS) combination. We feel that the stability has not significantly increased with the systems' increase in terms of short-term stability after comparing multiple groups of linkages.

Automated summary

This paper examines the effects of various ambiguity-fixed strategies and AR products for high-precision time-frequency transfer. The results show that the time stability is increased for a single GPS system, and the stability of combinations is improved after the addition of the Galileo system. However, the frequency stability has barely improved.