4.4 Review

Oncological outcomes of lipofilling breast reconstruction: 195 consecutive cases and literature review

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2015.12.029

关键词

Lipofilling; Fat graft; Breast cancer; Breast reconstruction

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Lipofilling has become a widely used procedure in breast reconstruction after mastectomy or breast-conserving treatment. The possibility that this technique may increase stimulation of cancer development between the potential tumor bed and the lipoaspirates grafts has been raised regarding its safety. The aim of this study was to identify the oncological risks associated with this procedure in our institution. Methods: Between years 2007 and 2014 we record 195 consecutive patients with fat grafting technique for reconstructive purpose after breast cancer treatment. The loco-regional recurrence (LRR) as first event of relapse was the primary end point of this study. Results: We performed 319 lipofilling procedures in 132 mastectomy and 63 breast-conserving surgery patients. Invasive carcinoma represents 81.6% of the series. The median follow-up from primary cancer surgery and fat grafting was 74 and 31 months respectively. Median time between oncologic surgery and lipofilling was 36 months. The authors observed a complication rate of 8.2%, most of them liponecrosis and oil cysts (7.2%). Four local, 2 regional and 4 distant recurrences were observed as first event of relapse in 10 patients with invasive ductal carcinoma. The loco-regional recurrence rate was 3.1% (1.08% per year). Conclusions: Although larger prospective trials are needed, these results support the fact that lipofilling following breast cancer treatment leads to a very low rate of complications and similar to other authors, it does not seem to interfere in patient's oncological prognosis when compared with prior publications. (C) 2016 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据