4.7 Article

Analysis of Soil Moisture Change Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Grassland on the Tibetan Plateau

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 15, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs15020298

关键词

soil moisture; NDVI; Tibetan Plateau

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzed the effect of vegetation greening on soil moisture on the Tibetan Plateau. The results showed that both vegetation greening and soil moisture exhibited a stable increasing trend from 1982 to 2015. Precipitation was identified as the most influential factor in soil moisture changes.
Soil moisture is an important component of the soil-vegetation-atmosphere terrestrial hydrological cycle and is an important factor affecting terrestrial ecosystems. In the context of extensive vegetation greening on the Tibetan Plateau (TP), it is important to investigate the effect of vegetation greening on soil moisture to maintain ecosystem stability and protect the sustainability of ecological restoration projects. To evaluate the effect of vegetation greening on soil moisture on the TP, the spatial distribution and trends of soil moisture and vegetation on the TP were analyzed using GIMMS NDVI data and ERA5 soil moisture data from 1982 to 2015. The effects of grassland NDVI, precipitation, and temperature on SM were also explored using multiple regression apparent and SEM. The main results are as follows: from 1982 to 2015, both grassland NDVI and SM showed a stable increasing trend. Precipitation was the most important factor influencing SM changes on the TP. In the context that vegetation greening is mainly influenced by temperature increase, vegetation plays a dominant role in SM changes in soil drying and soil wetting zones. In this paper, the climate-vegetation-soil moisture coupling mechanism of grasslands on the TP is investigated, and the related results can provide some theoretical references and suggestions for global ecosystem conservation and the sustainable development of ecological restoration projects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据