4.7 Article

A Robust Track Error Estimation Method for Airborne SAR Based on Accuracy Analysis Model

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 14, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs14225769

关键词

synthetic aperture radar (SAR); track error estimation; Cramer-Rao Lower Bound (CRLB); autofocus

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFA0701903]
  2. NSFC [62022082]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the motion error estimation model for Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) carried by small Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). By deriving the Cramer-Rao Lower Bound (CRLB), the factors affecting estimation accuracy are determined, and an improved autofocus method is proposed to suppress noise more effectively and enhance estimation accuracy.
With the development of miniaturization technology, Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) can be equipped on small carriers such as small Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). In order to lower the cost, the accuracy of navigation equipment carried by UAV SAR is usually limited, so it is challenging to meet the requirements of SAR imaging and locating accuracy. Therefore, accurately estimating SAR tracks becomes a crucial issue. So, for the motion error estimation model widely used in current literature, this paper derives the accuracy limits of the model for the first time. The derived Cramer-Rao Lower Bound (CRLB) specifies the factors affecting the estimation accuracy, which provides new insights into the estimation model. The in-depth analysis of how the factors affect CRLB can guide the setting of the parameters while using the estimation method. Moreover, based on the accuracy analysis model, this paper improves the WTLS-based autofocus method (WTA) by selecting the appropriate estimation kernel step. The proposed method can suppress noise more effectively and further ensure estimation accuracy compared to WTA. Airborne SAR data experiments in the high-resolution condition obtain trajectory estimation results of 0.02 m.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据