4.7 Article

CONSTDET: Control Semantics-Based Detection for GPS Spoofing Attacks on UAVs

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 14, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs14215587

关键词

UAV; GPS spoofing attacks; GPS spoofing detection; control semantics; machine learning

资金

  1. Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi [2021JQ207, 2022JQ-621, 2022JQ-658]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [62272366]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [XJS211506]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a control semantics-based detection approach called CONSTDET is proposed for GPS spoofing attacks on UAVs using machine learning algorithms. Real experiments and evaluations demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of CONSTDET.
UAVs are widely used in agriculture, the military, and industry. However, it is easy to perform GPS spoofing attacks on UAVs, which can lead to catastrophic consequences. In this paper, we propose CONSTDET, a control semantics-based detection approach for GPS spoofing attacks of UAVs using machine learning algorithms. Various real experiments are conducted to collect real flight data, on the basis of which CONSTDET is designed as a practical detection framework. To train models for the detection of GPS spoofing attacks, specified flight data types are selected as features based on the control semantics, including the altitude control process and the horizontal position control process, since these data are able to represent the dynamic flight and control processes. Multiple machine learning algorithms are used to train and generate the best classifier for GPS spoofing attacks. CONSTDET is further implemented and deployed on a real UAV to support onboard detection. Experiments and evaluations validate that CONSTDET can effectively detect GPS spoofing attacks and the detection rate can reach 97.70%. The experimental comparison demonstrates that CONSTDET has better performance than existing detection approaches.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据